Linear weigh fillers
Good for moderate outputs, multiple products and controlled dry product dosing.
View routeFill hardware, fixings and small parts by target weight where counting and weighing routes need comparing.
Small parts such as screws, nails, washers and fixings can often be packed by weight, especially where exact piece count is less critical than pack value or total weight.
A practical route considers part size, sharp edges, bulk density, pack opening and whether the product marks or damages the packing equipment.
For some products, counting may be a better method. Lancing can help compare the weighing route against pack expectations.

Hardware applications may use weigh filling, counting or a combination depending on pack promise.
Good for moderate outputs, multiple products and controlled dry product dosing.
View routeUseful where speed, accuracy and product combination are central to the project.
View routeOften compared for powders, fine ingredients and products that need screw dosing.
View routeFor automatic bag forming, weighing, filling and sealing from film reels.
View routeThese pages help narrow the specification by product, pack format and machine type.
A practical guide to comparing machine type, pack handling, output and tolerance.
Read moreCompare the main weighing and dosing routes for dry products.
Read morePrepare the information needed before requesting a machine recommendation.
Read moreShort answers for production teams comparing dry-product weighing and filling routes.
Useful details include the product name, bulk density if known, target fill weight, acceptable tolerance, pack format, output per minute or hour and whether the line must connect to feeding, sealing, capping, labelling or checkweighing equipment.
Linear weighers, multihead weighers and auger fillers may all be considered depending on product flow, dose size and output target.
Yes. Many projects involve product feed, weighing, filling, pack handling, sealing or closing and downstream checking. Sending the full pack route helps avoid choosing a filler that later becomes difficult to integrate.
Lancing can advise whether a linear weigher, multihead weigher, auger filler, VFFS line or integrated route is the practical starting point.
Small parts often need a count, a weight, or both. These questions help decide whether a weigh filler route is suitable.
Yes, where each part has a predictable weight and the agreed count tolerance allows for natural part variation. A representative sample should be weighed and physically counted before the route is confirmed.
The sample should be large enough to test feeder behaviour, discharge and repeatability. A few perfect examples rarely show how parts behave when a hopper is filled from real production boxes.
Common checks include manual count sampling, weight range checks and finished-pack checkweighing. The right method depends on the value of the parts and the buyer’s quality system.