Flow and handling
Particle size, dust, fragility, stickiness, static, density variation and whether the product bridges or surges.
A connected route for projects where the machine must form the bag from roll film, dose the product by weight or auger, then seal and discharge the finished pack.

VFFS routes are relevant when the line must form a bag from roll film, dose product and seal the finished pack. The practical shortlist depends on film, bag size, dosing method, coding, checkweighing and discharge handling.
Start with the real product, not a catalogue category. Flow behaviour, target weight, acceptable tolerance, pack presentation and operator workflow determine whether this machine route is practical.
Use this route to compare a VFFS weigh filling line against your product, target weight, pack format, output target and line constraints. The links below also help you compare related machine and application options before asking for advice.
These are the details that normally change the recommendation, model, controls, integration points and final line layout.
Particle size, dust, fragility, stickiness, static, density variation and whether the product bridges or surges.
Pouch, bag, jar, tub, bottle, sachet or downstream feed, plus the sealing or closing method after filling.
Target packs per minute, tolerance, operator involvement, cleaning frequency and future SKU changeovers.
Useful quick answers before you send your product and pack details.
Choose VFFS when you need the packaging machine to form bags from roll film, fill them and seal them in one integrated process.
Yes. The dosing unit is selected around product behaviour, so a VFFS line may use a multihead weigher, linear weigher, auger filler or other feeder.
Bag size, film material, seal type, product flow, target weight, coding, checkweighing, speed and available floor space all affect the line specification.
That gives Lancing enough information to compare a linear weigher, multihead weigher, auger filler or integrated bagging line.